Skill Alignment Feature

A web app onboarding and survey feature that collects and shares 360 feedback

My role

User research, UX design, Wireframing, UI design, Prototyping

Tools

Figma, Figjam, Photoshop, Illustrator

Timeframe

3 months

Design brief

Description

The Skill Alignment feature of the Lingo Live coaching platform captures each coachee’s top three focus skills and collects 360 survey feedback from their team members to measure coachee progress and business impact.

Context

Lingo Live is an online B2B leadership coaching provider. A typical client is a Learning & Development leader who wants to provide coaching to a group of employees to improve business results. In order to continue or expand the program, the client needs to be able to demonstrate improved business results to their leadership team. One of the most persuasive ways to do this is to show that coachee’s team members observed improved performance on the job through 360 feedback.

Contraints

The scope of this project was limited to the onboarding flow, a series of emails and surveys, and a profile page for the first iteration.

Onboarding pages

Emails

Surveys (123)

Learner profile page

Problem statement

User problem

Lingo Live clients wanted make sure their employees were using coaching to develop skills that were important for their teams and the business as well as their own personal development.

Business problem

Lingo Live sales and customer success data indicated that the company had lost deals and expansion opportunities as a result of not providing 360 feedback data. Providing this data also aligned with the company’s positioning as a strategic Skills-Based Coaching provider, in contrast more freeform and well-being-focused coaching options.

User research

Interviews

I interviewed seven prospects and former customers who closely matched our Ideal Customer Profile and five coachees who had recently participated in a pilot program to better understand their program and platform needs.

Key findings

  • Clients wanted coachees to get manager input before the program to encourage alignment with team and business goals.

  • Clients wanted both quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitive data helps to tell the story of a cohort as a while and qualitative helps clarify the meaning to the business with concrete examples.

  • Clients were interested in tracking 1-3 skills for each coachee, ideally with skill ratings before and after the program to show behavior change, which is the most important data for executives to see.

  • Clients think program surveys are appropriate, but should be minimal because they already run many surveys of their own.

  • Coachees use the platform minimally and they consider existing automated platform emails appropriate, not bothersome.

User personas

To better understand how to design for clients and coachees, I developed a user personas based on the user research interviews.

Dashel: Coachee Persona

  • Lead Engineer

  • 28 years old

  • Works at a fast-growing startup

Use Case

  • Takes a Lingo Live session once a week.

  • On the cusp of getting promoted to a management position.

Samantha: L&D Administrator Persona

  • Director of Learning & Development

  • 40 years old

  • Works at a fast-growing startup

Use Case

  • Hired Lingo Live to coach to high-potentials and new managers.

  • Reports to leadership about L&D program status once a quarter.

  • Very busy. Needs program reporting to be as easy as possible.

User flows

In order to understand how coachees and their team members would experience the Skill Alignment feature over the course of a coaching program, I created a registration user flow (including several new pages to add to the onboarding process), and a survey submission user flow (including platform-generated emails, unique survey pages, and a learner profile page).

I accounted for both the happy path of collecting a coachee’s survey results on-time and the less happy, but likely scenario, that coachees and their team members soetimes would not submit their surveys in a timely manner or at all, (we knew low survey response rates had been a big issue in the past).

Registration user flow (see FigJam file)

Survey submission user flow (see Figjam file)

Wireframes

I created wireframes to better understand how our information should be organized into page layouts to clearly communicate what our users needed to know without overwhelming them. We departed from them in some ways, but generally, they set us on the right path.

Registration wireframes

Outcome

Customer feedback

  1. The feature helps them align coachees’ personal growth in the program with the needs of the company.

  2. It helps them to track coachee’s development journey.

  3. They recommended that the coachee work with their manager on a learning plan and review it at the midpoint and end of the coaching experience.

  4. They’d like to be notified about unresponsive managers.

  5. Poorly trained managers are a risk. They might not deliver feedback well. Toolkits could help.

Interestingly, three interviewees told us the feature wouldn’t allow them to do anything new, a finding which eventually led us to develop a whole new coaching platform.
See all customer research

Coach feedback

  1. The increased complexity might lead to delays in initial session booking.

  2. Coaches should be notified about new survey results so they aren’t caught off-guard.

  3. Insight Providers should have more visibility into the goal setting process so they have more context when they provide feedback.

Participant feedback

  1. Some users wanted to see all questions ahead of time, so they could consider their responses.

  2. It could be annoying to have to pick skills from a predefined list. They might not resonate with the coachee or their team.

“I really like the new functionality and how the information is delivered to the coachee. In the past, I found it difficult to find review past survey responses to see how I have improved. This information is valuable in the learning process.”

Learner/Manager

“It will be helpful for the coachee to share what they want to work on, commit to that, and modify their behavior so that when we go back in 3 or 6 months the coachee says, ‘Yes, I’ve seen a marked difference.’ That’s what would persuade our execs of the value of this program.”

L&D Client

“Getting feedback at the midpoint will be huge because we can see if what we are doing is working and adjust accordingly. I also feel that directly involving the insight providers will create more accountability and focus.”

Keith Turner, Coach

Previous
Previous

Coaching platform 2.0, a web app

Next
Next

Lingo Live brand refresh, .com site and collateral